Federal Judge Halts Efforts to Dismantle USAID Criticizes Musk’s Role

On Tuesday, a federal judge ruled that the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) attempt to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was likely unconstitutional. Judge Theodore D. Chuang of Maryland issued an order halting the agency’s closure and mandating the restoration of electronic system access for employees and contractors affected by the actions.

Musk’s Role Under Scrutiny

The ruling specifically targeted Elon Musk, dedicating several pages to examining the White House’s statements and Musk’s involvement in orchestrating DOGE’s actions. Despite his role as an adviser and close ally to President Trump, Chuang emphasized Musk’s significant influence in the dismantling efforts.

Constitutional Concerns Raised

Judge Chuang highlighted that Musk’s leadership in DOGE without proper Senate approval could violate the U.S. Constitution’s Appointments Clause. He noted that allowing such actions could erode the integrity of the Constitution’s framework, where only duly appointed officials should hold significant government power.

Trump Administration’s Setback

This decision marks a significant setback for one of the Trump administration’s early moves to reduce the size of the federal government. The push to dismantle USAID involved layoffs, closing the agency’s headquarters, and recalling employees stationed abroad, aiming to cut its 10,000-person workforce.

Trump Nominates Michelle Bowman as Vice Chair for the Fed

President Donald Trump has nominated Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman to assume the position of vice chair for supervision…

Lawsuit and Legal Grounds

Over two dozen USAID employees and contractors filed the lawsuit, challenging DOGE’s authority and Musk’s involvement. They argued that the actions exceeded the separation of powers and lacked proper legal appointments, undermining the functioning of the agency.

Security Protocol Violations and White House Overreach

The ruling criticized DOGE for bypassing security protocols, exposing sensitive information. Chuang questioned the White House’s actions. He noted that attempting to dismantle USAID without congressional approval was unconstitutional. This raised concerns about the balance of executive power.

Government’s Defense and White House Response

Government attorneys defended the actions, asserting that the executive branch holds the authority to control foreign relations and agency priorities. In response to the ruling, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly called the decision a “miscarriage of justice” and vowed to appeal, accusing judges of undermining President Trump’s agenda.

Plaintiffs Celebrate Legal Victory

Norm Eisen, executive chair of the State Democracy Defenders Fund, praised the ruling as a key victory. It challenged Musk’s role in DOGE’s actions, marking a significant legal development. The decision could influence future legal challenges involving Musk’s actions in cryptocurrency markets. Eisen emphasized its importance for upholding legal accountability in such cases.